Shooting UK

Shooting UK is your complete shooting resource. From gun reviews to shotgun licence and firearms certificate information, to clay pigeon shooting, game shooting, shooting lessons and gundog training.

Ruddy duck cull: £740 a pop

By Selena Masson

Thursday, 11 February 2010

Costly but effective eradication of the UK’s ruddy duck to finish this summer

The controversial five-year cull of the UK’s population of non-native ruddy duck being undertaken by the Food and Environment Research Agency (FERA) has, according to figures revealed by DEFRA last week, cost taxpayers £4.6million and accounted for more than 6,200 birds — a cost of approximately £740 per bird. Despite its extent and expense, critics of the culling programme argue it will not be completely effective as pockets of the birds remain.

The culling programme, scheduled to finish this August, is being undertaken in order to protect the threatened Spanish population of white-headed duck with which the ruddy duck has been known to interbreed. In Spain, control of ruddy duck is ongoing. Six ruddy duck were seen there in 2008, the most recent year for which figures are available, and all of them were culled. The culling programme in the UK has seen far larger numbers of ruddy duck eradicated. At the start of the programme in September 2005, the UK population of the duck was estimated at 4,400. Since then FERA has culled more than 6,200 birds, with the most recent cull taking place just days ago in Hampshire. The remaining population is estimated to number only a few hundred birds.

Several online birding sites and forums have highlighted the expense of the culling operation and have criticised the “Government marksmen” and “DEFRA gunships” employed on the UK’s lakes to cull the duck. The jobs of culling operatives were filled following advertising in the pages of Shooting Times several years ago. Indeed, the accuracy of the “marksmen” has countered the argument that the cull would impact on non-target species. During a three-year trial cull between 1999 and 2002, a total of 15 non-target species were shot, in comparison with 2,651 ruddy duck culled, which equates to a 0.006 per cent rate of errors.

The rest of this article appears in 10th February issue of Shooting Times.

What is YOUR opinion?

Join other ST readers in our forums to discuss your views.



Like this article? Mark this page on a social bookmarking website...



What are social bookmarking sites?



CompPrevious
Battle over Alladale "re-wilding" continues

Battle over Alladale "re-wilding" continues

Alladale, the Sutherland estate owned by millionai...

CompNext
Poult tax: DEFRA's plans shelved

Poult tax: DEFRA's plans shelved

Plans to tax England’s gamefarmers and rearer...


Guns

Perazzi SC3 shotgun review

Perazzi SC3 shotgun review

Every shooter dreams of a bespoke shotgun, so they should take a look ... Read more


More in Guns...


Sporting Answers

Should I get Hobs or Jills when buying ferrets?

Should I get Hobs or Jills when buying ferrets?

I am about to acquire two ferrets but am puzzled to know which sex is ... Read more


More in Sporting Answers...


News

Alliance: the most inspiring political force in 10 years?

Alliance: the most inspiring political force in 10 years?

The Countryside Alliance has made the shortlist of Channel 4's mo... Read more


More in News...


Comments

Shooting Times Magazine

What's in this issue?

Don't miss this week's issue (on sale Wednesday 16th May). FREE PRIZE DRAW: Win a Browning T-bolt.22 and Winchester ammo. Graham Downing gives his tips on where to find the best foreign sport! For all this and a whole lot more buy your copy today!

Subscribe to magazine


Subscribe to Shooting Times

Shooting Gazette Magazine

Save up to 31% on a subscription to Shooting Times & Country Magazine, subscribe today and perfect gift this Christmas.


Bowman trap

Don't miss your chance to win this fantastic Supermatch One

Enter competition