Shooting UK

Shooting UK is your complete shooting resource. From gun reviews to shotgun licence and firearms certificate information, to clay pigeon shooting, game shooting, shooting lessons and gundog training.

Wildfowlers denied right of appeal

Wildfowlers denied right of appeal

wildfowling13sept


By Selena Masson

Tuesday, 26 May 2009

Wildfowling clubs may be denied the right to appeal against aspects of Government’s controversial Coastal Access Bill

Those with coastal sporting rights in England will have no status during Natural England’s consultation process on the controversial Marine and Coastal Access Bill, according to the Countryside Alliance (CA).

Pro-shooting organisations have recently held a series of meetings with the Government to clarify certain parts of the bill in a bid to safeguard the rights of wildfowlers and other shooters.

Currently, those with “an interest in land” are allowed to appeal decisions on proposed coastal access areas. This includes landowners, leaseholders and those in lawful occupation of the land such as farmers with grazing rights. The Government has confirmed to the CA that this defi nition does not include holders of sporting rights, however.

The CA’s James Legge explained: “In practical terms, this means that wildfowling clubs that hold sporting rights over land that they do not own will not have proper statutory recognition when the coastal access routes and associated ‘spreading room’ are defined.” Mr Legge added that The Crown Estate alone currently grants 59 leases covering more than 700km of foreshore. None of those lessees, or the hundreds of other clubs and shoots
that lease or own sporting rights, will have full statutory rights in the process of reclassifi cation of the coastal land they shoot over. They would only have the right to appeal against the imposition, or the failure to impose, any restrictions or exclusions.

“As it stands, the bill would allow Natural England to allocate a significant part of a marsh or shoot for public access without necessarily consulting the holder of sporting rights,” said Mr Legge. Government assurances about a general right of appeal for closures and restrictions are not good enough, according to the CA. “Owners of sporting rights have a valid interest in the designation and management of coastal access land,” said Mr Legge.

The rest of this article appears in 28 May issue of Shooting Times.

What is YOUR opinion?

Join other ST readers in our forums to discuss your views.



Like this article? Mark this page on a social bookmarking website...



What are social bookmarking sites?



CompPrevious
DEFRA to tax 16p per gamebird?

DEFRA to tax 16p per gamebird?

DEFRA’s proposed levy on gamebirds in England...

CompNext
The north/south divide of birds

The north/south divide of birds

While numbers of woodland birds are up by as much ...


Guns

Weatherby SA-08 semi-auto

Weatherby SA-08 semi-auto

Less showy than its forebears, the lightweight and pointable W... Read more


More in Guns...


Sporting Answers

How do I choose a labrador puppy?

I am looking for a labrador puppy to buy, but so many seem to have �... Read more


More in Sporting Answers...


News

Licence fees - ACPO calls for 88% rise in cost

Licence fees - ACPO calls for 88% rise in cost

New licence fee charges proposed to the Home Office... Read more


More in News...


Comments

Shooting Times Magazine

What's in this issue?

Don't miss this week's issue (on sale Wednesday 16th May). FREE PRIZE DRAW: Win a Browning T-bolt.22 and Winchester ammo. Graham Downing gives his tips on where to find the best foreign sport! For all this and a whole lot more buy your copy today!

Subscribe to magazine


Subscribe to Shooting Times

Shooting Gazette Magazine

Save up to 31% on a subscription to Shooting Times & Country Magazine, subscribe today and perfect gift this Christmas.


Bowman trap

Don't miss your chance to win this fantastic Supermatch One

Enter competition