Shooting UK

ShootingUK is the complete shooting resource for the British shooting community. From shotgun licence and shotgun certificate information to gun reviews, game shooting, clay shooting and more.

The Hunting Act misses its mark

The Hunting Act misses its mark

The majority of the cases brought were for offences traditionally dealt with under anti-poaching laws


By Selena Masson

Friday, 30 January 2009

New figures prove the Hunting Act does little more than double-up on existing poaching laws

Pro-hunting organisations have rejected Government figures which show that 76 people have been prosecuted under the 2004 Hunting Act and that 56 were found guilty between its implementation, in February 2005, and the end of 2007. The majority of the cases brought were for offences traditionally dealt with under anti-poaching laws.

The Home Office’s figures were revealed on 13 January in answer to a Parliamentary question from pro-hunting Conservative MP David Ruffley.

The Countryside Alliance’s Simon Hart said the figures paint a very skewed picture: “On the face of it, these numbers could suggest there is a considerable amount of illegal hunting going on and that the Act is in some way working. It does not take much digging, however, to discover that the ‘hunting’ that people are being prosecuted for is far from the organised hunting targeted by politicians and animal rights groups during the
progress of the legislation.”

The Countryside Alliance also pointed out that the area with the highest number of prosecutions under the Act was Merseyside, where there have been 20 convictions, seven of which were for hunting rats without the permission of the landowner. “The rest were prosecuted for hunting rabbits, hares and foxes — again, all without the permission of the landowner. Most were likely to have been liable for prosecution before the Hunting Act was passed under
other pieces of legislation dealing with poaching,” added Simon Hart.

The rest of this article appears in 29 January issue of Shooting Times.

What is YOUR opinion?

Join other ST readers in our forums to discuss your views.



Like this article? Mark this page on a social bookmarking website...



What are social bookmarking sites?



CompPrevious
Kennel Club figures show gundogs remain top dogs

Kennel Club figures show gundogs remain top dogs

The Kennel Club’s annual breed registration s...

CompNext
Court case prompts contract reminder

Court case prompts contract reminder

An Employment Appeals Tribunal case that concluded...


Guns

Howa Lightning 1500 rifle review

Howa Lightning 1500 rifle review

Howa Lightning 1500 rifle review: The Howa Lightning 1500 rifle is a m... Read more


More in Guns...


Sporting Answers

Do beaters need insurance on my shoot?

Do beaters need insurance on my shoot?

All the guns on our shoot are insured, so is it necessary to take out ... Read more


More in Sporting Answers...


News

Badger numbers reach fox levels

Badgers are now as common in England’s countryside as foxes, acc... Read more


More in News...


Comments

Shooting Times Magazine

What's in this issue?

Don't miss this week's issue (on sale Wednesday 1st February). FREE PRIZE DRAW - it is week 3 of our great "Gun a Week" competition, see P53 for further details and how to enter! Plus, who is top dog? Paul Rawlings reports on the 2012 Cocker Spaniel Championship. Get down to your newsagents and buy your copy today!

Subscribe to magazine


Latest articles

John Humphreys - Country Gun passes away

John Humphreys - Country Gun passes away

A legend in the shooting world, Shooting Times' much-loved column... Read more


Licensing link dismissed

Licensing link dismissed

Police deny accusations after fatal shooting... Read more


More in Latest articles...


Subscribe to Shooting Times

Shooting Gazette Magazine

Save up to 31% on a subscription to Shooting Times & Country Magazine, subscribe today and perfect gift this Christmas.