Shooting UK

From guns and gundogs to the latest shooting news; the complete online network for the British shooting community.

Court case prompts contract reminder

Court case prompts contract reminder

A recent case saw a gamekeeper’s dismissal compensation halved and his bonus scrapped due to the
ambiguous nature of his verbal contract.


By Selena Masson

Thursday, 29 January 2009

Gamekeeping organisations appeal to keepers to check their contracts

An Employment Appeals Tribunal case that concluded on 20 January saw a gamekeeper’s dismissal compensation halved and his bonus scrapped due to the ambiguous nature of his verbal contract.

The case has prompted gamekeeping organisations to highlight the need for proper employment contracts.

In January 2008, Sheikh Maher al-Tajir, who owns the 24,000-acre Blackford estate, in Perthshire, was accused of unfairly dismissing his gamekeeper
Chris Mulqueeney, and of reneging on a deal to pay a bonus of 10p per
pheasant shot, which Mr Mulqueeney claimed he was verbally promised.
Though Mr Mulqueeney was originally awarded £13,000 in unpaid bonuses and
compensation for loss of earnings, the Employment Appeal Tribunal ruled the
compensation should be halved and his bonus scrapped.

In the appeal, the judge, the HonourableLady Smith, found that “matters were left too uncertain to amount to an enforceable contract” and that no bonus should be paid. Helen Benson, of the Gamekeepers’ Welfare Network (GWN), said this case highlights the need for legally binding contracts. She told ST that an alarming number of keepers do not have a contract in place, relying instead on informal agreements: “I would recommend that all shoot employers and gamekeepers adhere to employment law and follow statutory procedures to avoid ambiguity and dispute.

With regard to contractual obligations, there is room for improvement, for example training for headkeepers is woefully inadequate. Employers have a duty of care inherent in the contract of employment and should ensure they are aware of their responsibilities to employees.”

The rest of this article appears in 29 January issue of Shooting Times.

What is YOUR opinion?

Join other ST readers in our forums to discuss your views.



Like this article? Mark this page on a social bookmarking website...



What are social bookmarking sites?


CompPrevious
The Hunting Act misses its mark

The Hunting Act misses its mark

Pro-hunting organisations have rejected Government...

CompNext
Red-sika hybrids are on the up

Red-sika hybrids are on the up

New research has revealed the extent to which Scot...


Guns

Guerini Essex Limited 20/28-bore

Guerini Essex Limited 20/28-bore

After testing it in the field, Lewis Potter find Guerini's elegan... Read more


More in Guns...


Sporting Answers

Can you give me some information about buying a gundog?

Can you give me some information about buying a gundog?

I am intending to buy a gundog puppy for rough-shooting. Can you advis... Read more


More in Sporting Answers...


News

Golden eagle persecution claims rebuked

Golden eagle persecution claims rebuked

The Golden Eagle Trust (GET), managing the Irish Golden Eagle reintrod... Read more


More in News...



Comments

Shooting Times Magazine

What's in this issue?

Don't miss your chance to enter our FREE prize draw in this week's magazine (on sale 10th March) to win the new Browning B525 Hunter 12-bore worth over £1,400. Get down to your newsagents and buy your copy now!

Subscribe to magazine

Save up to 30% on a subscription to Shooting Times & Country Magazine, subscribe today!


Latest articles

Locals vote no to sea eagles

Locals vote no to sea eagles

The Norfolk Wildlife Trust's AGM attracted more than 100 ... Read more


Dog owners face competency test

Dog owners face competency test

A "competency test" for all dog owners could be impl... Read more


More in Latest articles...


Subscribe to Shooting Times

Shooting Gazette Magazine

Save up to 30% on a subscription to Shooting Times & Country Magazine, subscribe today!