Shooting UK

Shooting UK is your complete shooting resource. From gun reviews to shotgun licence and firearms certificate information, to clay pigeon shooting, game shooting, shooting lessons and gundog training.

Test hunting case to define law

Test hunting case to define law

It is thought the outcome of the case, which is expected early this year, could have major implications for several hunts with trials on hold


By Selena Masson

Monday, 12 January 2009

Hunts around the country await the decision of a landmark hunting case

The Government’s definition of hunting could be turned on its head after two West Country hunts appeared in a High Court test case in London last month to define the term.

The Exmoor Foxhounds and the Devon and Somerset Staghounds went to court to help define the word and how the law on exemptions from the ban should be applied.

It is thought the outcome of the case, which is expected early this year, could have major implications for several hunts with trials on hold. It will also impact on dog owners.

The Crown Prosecution Service’s (CPS) Kerry Barker told judges the court’s
guidance was needed on whether the term to “hunt” a wild mammal, as it appears in the 2004 Hunting Act, includes the activity of “searching for” an animal to stalk or flush it out. Mr Barker said: “If searching for a wild mammal with dogs is not illegal, then it is difficult to see how Parliament’s intention of preventing cruelty and bringing an end to the sport of hunting can be met.”

Philip Mott QC, appearing for the huntsmen, argued that reversing the burden of proof, as the CPS definition does, would cause a serious imbalance at trial and result in “a substantial infringement” of the normal presumption that a defendant was “innocent until proven guilty”.

Mr Mott also argued that the word “hunting” should not be extended to include “searching”. He told the court: “If ‘hunting’ is interpreted widely to include ‘searching’ and the burden of proof is on the defendant to prove an exemption, that burden would be even more oppressive.”

The rest of this article appears in 8 January issue of Shooting Times.

What is YOUR opinion?

Join other ST readers in our forums to discuss your views.



Like this article? Mark this page on a social bookmarking website...



What are social bookmarking sites?



CompPrevious

Birds of prey poisoning map released by Scottish Government

The new map highlights ‘hot spots’ where...

CompNext
Ex-keeper escapes jail

Ex-keeper escapes jail

Last September Burden was given a similar sentence...


Guns

Yildiz SPZM .410 multi-choke

Yildiz SPZM .410 multi-choke

Designed with the younger shooter in mind, the .410 over-and-under Yil... Read more


More in Guns...


Sporting Answers

Is sugar the answer to stop my dog from having fits?

Is sugar the answer to stop my dog from having fits?

I have two springer spaniels, one five years old and the other 15 mont... Read more


More in Sporting Answers...


News

Dorset gamekeeper hurt in gas explosion

Dorset gamekeeper hurt in gas explosion

Industry experts are urging countryside workers to keep up with essent... Read more


More in News...


Comments

Shooting Times Magazine

What's in this issue?

Don't miss this week's issue (on sale Wednesday 16th May). FREE PRIZE DRAW: Win a Browning T-bolt.22 and Winchester ammo. Graham Downing gives his tips on where to find the best foreign sport! For all this and a whole lot more buy your copy today!

Subscribe to magazine


Subscribe to Shooting Times

Shooting Gazette Magazine

Save up to 31% on a subscription to Shooting Times & Country Magazine, subscribe today and perfect gift this Christmas.


Bowman trap

Don't miss your chance to win this fantastic Supermatch One

Enter competition